On Sat, 08 Sep 2007 12:08:02 -0500 Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So how does that establish that he was lying when he previously said he > hadn't found it? And what response did you expect after making that > accusation? I expected an acknowledgment, apology and retraction. Not an unreasonable expectation after presenting facts as I did. Lonnie's immediate disappearance when confronted with the facts reveals that his initial statement and follow-ups were deliberate lies and not simply a misunderstanding as I had initially assumed. I find it difficult to trust the word of proven liars, myself. I hope this clarifies the situation for you. > Is there some reason I should care about this? Where's the technical point? I wouldn't know. You are the one who requested further information and clarification -- apparently you care; you have not told me why so you're the only one who can answer your own question here. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
