jdow wrote: > Chu - directing that at greshko might have been more appropriate. > "Ed" was most impolite for no good reason. "Scroom and the horse > he rode in on," would be a suitable reply for Ed's behavior. I'm not sure about "no good reason". Somebody signs up for a mailing list with their "normal" email address and it gets harvested and they get more spam and then say the distribution is flawed based on that.....well it just gets my goat. The induhvidual blames everyone except themselves. Let's not get into a tit for tat on "behavior" shall we. I can surely point out times where others "behavior" went over my line....or is it over your line....or is it over some imaginary line.... The simple point I suppose I should have made is...you put your email address on a public list and you expose yourself to spam. Should the email list be responsible to protect you from your folly? I think not.
