On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 20:46 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > jdow wrote: > > Chu - directing that at greshko might have been more appropriate. > > "Ed" was most impolite for no good reason. "Scroom and the horse > > he rode in on," would be a suitable reply for Ed's behavior. > > I'm not sure about "no good reason". Somebody signs up for a mailing list > with their "normal" email address and it gets harvested and they get more > spam and then say the distribution is flawed based on that.....well it just > gets my goat. The induhvidual blames everyone except themselves. > > Let's not get into a tit for tat on "behavior" shall we. I can surely point > out times where others "behavior" went over my line....or is it over your > line....or is it over some imaginary line.... > > The simple point I suppose I should have made is...you put your email > address on a public list and you expose yourself to spam. Should the email > list be responsible to protect you from your folly? I think not. > Just when were you appointed Fedora's "Defender and Chief"? -- ======================================================================= A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works. ======================================================================= Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
