-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tim wrote: > On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 01:13 -0700, David Boles wrote: >> Hmm.. That's odd. I always leave two blank lines both before and >> after for an 'inline message reply' and two lines after and >> 'end of post' reply. I have been scolded for doing that (it >> should only be one line according to some) but never for what >> you describe. > > Can you have a look at your raw message source, this is what I saw > in your previous one (minus all the headers for where the mail went > through). I see no gap between quote and reply, and a - -- > signature separator. > > I know Thunderbird is fond of not posting things as you typed them, > nor showing things exactly as they are received. They're just two > reasons why I won't use it. Okay. This is an 'in message' reply. There are two blank lines above and there will be two blank lines below. Tell me what you see please. > ------------ beginning of my paste --------------- > > X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 0 X-loop: > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Updates X-BeenThere: > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: junk > Reply-To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> List-Id: For > users of Fedora <fedora-list.redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: > <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, > <mailto:fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe> > List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list> > List-Post: <mailto:fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> List-Help: > <mailto:fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=help> > List-Subscribe: > <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, > <mailto:fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe> Sender: > fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx Errors-To: > fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx Status: O X-UID: 79917 > Content-Length: 1370 X-Keywords: > > > X-Evolution-Source: imap://tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Tim wrote: >> On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 12:22 -0600, Karl Larsen wrote: >>> I had to load a new FC6 on my laptop and when I brought it up >>> the Package Updater told me there was 277 Updates! I see they >>> are many of them just replacement RPM's of the whole thing. I >>> used to hate > Windows >>> for all their update packages :-) >> At least with Linux, the updates replace the broken stuff on your >> machine, and you don't need to hang onto to the update packages. >> ;-) > >> I've watched Windows fill up the drive with downloaded patches > that you >> must keep on the drive, and it applies some patches on top of >> what > it's >> doing each run-time (booting gets slower and slower). > I have watched, and I admit that I have actually replied, to this > poster in the beginning. I have yet to see him acknowledge or reply > to anything. Everything is a 'big deal' or a disaster or something. > Nothing works well or is as it should be with Fedora Core 6 or > Fedora 7. > > Sniff... Sniff... I think that I smell a troll.... > - -- David -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) iD8DBQFGclKRrItTyWRhT1YRAgrqAKC+xTm+Hm46mrlw8QtEAsW2Uvi4fACeLKp8 q163xBhkf0DbCh8J2PlJlYA= =7sEU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
