On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 01:49 -0700, David Boles wrote: +++++++++++++ from here +++++++++++++++++++++++ > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Tim wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 01:13 -0700, David Boles wrote: > >> Hmm.. That's odd. I always leave two blank lines both before and > >> after for an 'inline message reply' and two lines after and > >> 'end of post' reply. I have been scolded for doing that (it > >> should only be one line according to some) but never for what > >> you describe. > > > > Can you have a look at your raw message source, this is what I saw > > in your previous one (minus all the headers for where the mail went > > through). I see no gap between quote and reply, and a - -- > > signature separator. > > > > I know Thunderbird is fond of not posting things as you typed them, > > nor showing things exactly as they are received. They're just two > > reasons why I won't use it. > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ to here is not visible until I open reply ++++++++ > Okay. This is an 'in message' reply. There are two blank lines above > and there will be two blank lines below. Tell me what you see please. > > > > ------------ beginning of my paste --------------- > > > > X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 0 X-loop: > > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Updates X-BeenThere: > > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: junk > > Reply-To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> List-Id: For > > users of Fedora <fedora-list.redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: > > <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, > > <mailto:fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe> > > List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list> > > List-Post: <mailto:fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> List-Help: > > <mailto:fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=help> > > List-Subscribe: > > <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, > > <mailto:fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe> Sender: > > fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx Errors-To: > > fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx Status: O X-UID: 79917 > > Content-Length: 1370 X-Keywords: > > > > > > X-Evolution-Source: imap://tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > Tim wrote: > >> On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 12:22 -0600, Karl Larsen wrote: > >>> I had to load a new FC6 on my laptop and when I brought it up > >>> the Package Updater told me there was 277 Updates! I see they > >>> are many of them just replacement RPM's of the whole thing. I > >>> used to hate > > Windows > >>> for all their update packages :-) > >> At least with Linux, the updates replace the broken stuff on your > >> machine, and you don't need to hang onto to the update packages. > >> ;-) > > > >> I've watched Windows fill up the drive with downloaded patches > > that you > >> must keep on the drive, and it applies some patches on top of > >> what > > it's > >> doing each run-time (booting gets slower and slower). > > I have watched, and I admit that I have actually replied, to this > > poster in the beginning. I have yet to see him acknowledge or reply > > to anything. Everything is a 'big deal' or a disaster or something. > > Nothing works well or is as it should be with Fedora Core 6 or > > Fedora 7. > > > > Sniff... Sniff... I think that I smell a troll.... > > > > - -- > > David > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) > > iD8DBQFGclKRrItTyWRhT1YRAgrqAKC+xTm+Hm46mrlw8QtEAsW2Uvi4fACeLKp8 > q163xBhkf0DbCh8J2PlJlYA= > =7sEU > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > Note the comments in line above. Regards, Les H
