Re: Updates - evolution issue with your David's messages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 01:13 -0700, David Boles wrote:
> Hmm..  That's odd. I always leave two blank lines both before and
> after for an 'inline message reply'  and two lines after and 'end of
> post' reply.  I have been scolded for doing that (it should only be
> one line according to some)  but never for what you describe.

Can you have a look at your raw message source, this is what I saw in
your previous one (minus all the headers for where the mail went
through).  I see no gap between quote and reply, and a - -- signature

I know Thunderbird is fond of not posting things as you typed them, nor
showing things exactly as they are received.  They're just two reasons
why I won't use it.

------------ beginning of my paste ---------------

X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 0 
X-loop: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Updates
X-BeenThere: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: junk
Reply-To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-Id: For users of Fedora <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>,
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <mailto:fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-Help: <mailto:fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <>,
Sender: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
Errors-To: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
Status: O
X-UID: 79917
Content-Length: 1370
X-Evolution-Source: imap://tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Hash: SHA1
Tim wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 12:22 -0600, Karl Larsen wrote:
>> I had to load a new FC6 on my laptop and when I brought it up the
>> Package Updater told me there was 277 Updates! I see they are many of
>> them just replacement RPM's of the whole thing. I used to hate Windows
>> for all their update packages :-)
> At least with Linux, the updates replace the broken stuff on your
> machine, and you don't need to hang onto to the update packages.  ;-)
> I've watched Windows fill up the drive with downloaded patches that you
> must keep on the drive, and it applies some patches on top of what it's
> doing each run-time (booting gets slower and slower).
I have watched, and I admit that I have actually replied, to this
poster in the beginning. I have yet to see him acknowledge or reply to
anything. Everything is a 'big deal' or a disaster or something.
Nothing works well or is as it should be with Fedora Core 6 or Fedora 7.

Sniff... Sniff...    I think that I smell a troll....

- --

Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)

fedora-list mailing list
To unsubscribe:

------------ ending of my paste ---------------

(This box runs Centos 5.0, my others still run FC 4, 5, 6, & 7, in case that's
 important to the thread.)

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux