On 2/25/07, Dotan Cohen <dotancohen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 23/02/07, aragonx@xxxxxxxxxx <aragonx@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yes technically and for performance reasons command > > line is superior but if Linux is to have wide spread use the technical > > level of the consumer has to be considered, in my opinion the Ubuntu > > distros are an attempt to move in this direction. > > Fedora/Redhat can NOT be the best distro for all applications. Perhaps it > isn't a very good desktop. I wouldn't know. I use them as servers. If > Ubuntu is a better desktop, great! When I need a desktop I will install > that. I think Redhat/Fedora make superior server distros and that is what > I use them for. There is plenty of room for a great desktop distro and a > great server distro. > > In the long run, it might even be wise for Redhat to specialize on the > server sector. The number of applications that are available for Linux > has grown to the point where I don't see how one company, no matter the > size, would be able to find the 'best of breed' apps for everything. > > With growth, comes change. > I agree that one distro should not be both server AND desktop. Even M$ has a desktop version of Windows (Vista) and a server version (Server). Well, it might be more like trashcan version and spambot version, but you get the point. Dotan Cohen
Strange complaint, since Fedora will have a Desktop and a Server spin - or are you implying that the diff. Windows "versions" are more than spins? -- Fedora Core 6 and proud
