Re: Monitor destroyed by install

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



ols6000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

At 09:47 AM 12/12/2006, you wrote:
So it was, at one point, displaying an image, and then it suddenly shut off? That doesn't sound like a bad signal. Bad sync rates won't stress a monitor and then make it shut off, they'll never display properly.

No, it didn't just shut off. It displayed some moving speckles.

That also doesn't sound like a sync issue... Actually it sounds like heat. I don't suppose you'd be willing to boot the installer and connect the monitor up to see what sync rate it uses? Because honestly, that's what bugs me the most about this scenario. Anaconda uses a very low resolution/sync for its installation. There's no way that it should overdrive any monitor.

No, I said the DVI input on the monitor works if I fool Windows XP into thinking there's a DVI input active. I do that by plugging a good monitor into the DVI, booting XP, then switching the cable. It looks like the Windows driver checks for the presence of a DVI monitor. I haven't checked the refresh rates, but the monitor gives an "out of range" message if you choose bad parameters.

That's exactly what it should do, and a good indication that it's not possible for a bad signal to damage the monitor.


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux