Re: The plus plus

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: The plus plus
From: Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 21:52:18 +0530
In-reply-to: <454B6514.8070800@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Red Hat
References: <16de708d0611012109s67f069bj196bba40f602d781@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <loom.20061102T170329-793@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <eid6cj$sim$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1162514234.14912.45.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <454B5636.2060108@xxxxxxxxxxx> <454B59FE.1010203@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <454B5DC9.8090505@xxxxxxxxxxx> <75C9520D-DE63-4010-B1FA-5FD49D3D70E7@xxxxxxxxxx> <454B6514.8070800@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061027)

Andy Green wrote:

OO or not OO: a major architectural decision, no matter what youpersonally ("we settled") considered resolved in the late 1970s.

OO is a methodology not very tied to the language. C with glib that isused in GTK and GNOME is pretty OO. QT doesnt use pure C++ either forthat matter.


Rahul

References:
- Is KDE on Fedora really that bad?
  - From: Arthur Pemberton
- Re: Is KDE on Fedora really that bad?
  - From: Kevin Kofler
- Re: Is KDE on Fedora really that bad?
  - From: Timothy Murphy
- Re: Is KDE on Fedora really that bad?
  - From: Joe Klemmer
- Re: The plus plus
  - From: Andy Green
- Re: The plus plus
  - From: Rahul Sundaram
- Re: The plus plus
  - From: Andy Green
- Re: The plus plus
  - From: Steffen Kluge
- Re: The plus plus
  - From: Andy Green

Prev by Date: Re: Analog Telephone Adapter usage
Next by Date: Re: The plus plus
Previous by thread: Re: The plus plus
Next by thread: Re: The plus plus
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]