On Thursday 23 February 2006 15:16, Mike McCarty wrote:
>Tim wrote:
>> It does NOT matter whether a cable is a cable-select cable or not,
>> when you jumper your drives as master and slave. They behave as
>> master and slave, as jumpered, no matter what the cable is.
>>
>> Why is it that people do not understand this? The jumpers on the
>> drive override anything else. You have to specifically set drives
>> into the cable-select mode for them to pay any attention to the type
>> of cabling.
>
>Well, that depends on the drive. The CS system is designed such that
>a drive *can* override based on jumpers, and I've never seen a drive
>which used the cable select to override the jumpers, and it wouldn't
>make sense do to so to me, but drives' incompatibilities with each
>other being what they are, and electronic designs and testing being
>what they are...
That last sentences is just another corrolary of Murphy's Law I believe.
>Mike
>--
>p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
>This message made from 100% recycled bits.
>You have found the bank of Larn.
>I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
>I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
--
Cheers, Gene
People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should add the word
'online' between the 'verizon', and the dot which bypasses vz's
stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-)
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2006 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
