Re: [OT] Fun with walking package licenses

Andy Green wrote:

Mike McCarty wrote:

I believe that despite what the packages say, the actual libraries used
in libgcc and compat-libstdc++ are LGPL, so this does not show a problem
AFAIK.

According to LGPL, they must provide their own stuff in a form suitable
for reverse engineering and modification for the customer's own use.
AFAICT, the only real distinction between GPL and LGPL is that the

We did this last month:

If you don't want to discuss it, then why did you bring it up again?

Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!