Re: [OT] Fun with walking package licenses

[Mike McCarty <mike.mccarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Andy Green wrote:
> Mike McCarty wrote:
>
>
> > > I believe that despite what the packages say, the actual libraries used
> > > in libgcc and compat-libstdc++ are LGPL, so this does not show a problem
> > > AFAIK.
> >
> > According to LGPL, they must provide their own stuff in a form suitable
> > for reverse engineering and modification for the customer's own use.
> > AFAICT, the only real distinction between GPL and LGPL is that the
>
>
> We did this last month:

If you don't want to discuss it, then why did you bring it up again?

Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!