Re: [OT] Fun with walking package licenses

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mike McCarty wrote:

>> I believe that despite what the packages say, the actual libraries used
>> in libgcc and compat-libstdc++ are LGPL, so this does not show a problem
>> AFAIK.
> 
> According to LGPL, they must provide their own stuff in a form suitable
> for reverse engineering and modification for the customer's own use.
> AFAICT, the only real distinction between GPL and LGPL is that the

We did this last month:

http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2006-January/msg02996.html

-Andy

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux