On Wed, 2006-15-02 at 12:01 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote: > What I said. MicroSoft products are better able to run > on old hardware than Linux. You sir are a paradox: you're subscribed to a Linux distro mailing list, but incessantly post about the GPL sucking, Linux being slow as hell, and Windows rocking your world. I am absolutely astounded by some of your statements, so I have to ask: why do you stay here if you have dislike Linux so? BTW, I was in your shoes once, but it was the other way around - I couldn't stand Windows. For a time, I dual booted RH 7.3 and then 8.0. When 9.0 hit the scene, I kissed Windows good bye. I eventually did the same for my company, and now happily run Linux and OSS for 99% of its operations. The only bit left is Quickbooks, which unfortunately is only available for Windows. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.15-1.1830_FC4 i686 GNU/Linux 14:11:40 up 7:11, 2 users, load average: 0.18, 0.29, 0.22
