Howdy, On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 14:23 -0500, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > On Wed, 2006-15-02 at 12:01 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote: > > > What I said. MicroSoft products are better able to run > > on old hardware than Linux. > > You sir are a paradox: you're subscribed to a Linux distro mailing list, > but incessantly post about the GPL sucking, Linux being slow as hell, > and Windows rocking your world. > > I am absolutely astounded by some of your statements, so I have to ask: > why do you stay here if you have dislike Linux so? > > BTW, I was in your shoes once, but it was the other way around - I > couldn't stand Windows. For a time, I dual booted RH 7.3 and then 8.0. > When 9.0 hit the scene, I kissed Windows good bye. I eventually did the > same for my company, and now happily run Linux and OSS for 99% of its > operations. The only bit left is Quickbooks, which unfortunately is > only available for Windows. Actually, there is a Linux alternative to Quickbooks :-) Don't have the info handy at the moment but, a google search containing, Quickbooks Linux should get you the desired information ;-) taharka Lexington, Kentucky U.S.A.