On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 14:23 -0500, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > On Wed, 2006-15-02 at 12:01 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote: > > > What I said. MicroSoft products are better able to run > > on old hardware than Linux. > > You sir are a paradox: you're subscribed to a Linux distro mailing list, > but incessantly post about the GPL sucking, Linux being slow as hell, > and Windows rocking your world. > > I am absolutely astounded by some of your statements, so I have to ask: > why do you stay here if you have dislike Linux so? > > BTW, I was in your shoes once, but it was the other way around - I > couldn't stand Windows. For a time, I dual booted RH 7.3 and then 8.0. > When 9.0 hit the scene, I kissed Windows good bye. I eventually did the > same for my company, and now happily run Linux and OSS for 99% of its > operations. The only bit left is Quickbooks, which unfortunately is > only available for Windows. > A free accounting package that blows the socks off quackbooks is Sql-Ledger http://www.sql-ledger.org/. Users have even created tools to migrate the closed and proprietary data to sql-ledger. Sql-Ledger works extremely well for almost any size enterprise. > Regards, > > Ranbir > > -- > Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu > Linux 2.6.15-1.1830_FC4 i686 GNU/Linux > 14:11:40 up 7:11, 2 users, load average: 0.18, 0.29, 0.22 > >
