On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 21:18 +0100, Bernd Radinger wrote: > On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 08:23:09 -0600, Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 08:12 +0100, Bernd Radinger wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 20:41:10 -0600, Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. It tried to remove libaasound.so.2 and libFLAC.so.4 plus one other I > > > > > > don't remember. All of which were required for one or more packages > > > > > > already installed > > > > > > > > > > 'flac' and 'alsa-lib' are from FC, not Fedora.us. > > > > Exactly.. Packages from FC were being modified by an update from > > > > fedora.us > > > > > > No package at Fedora.us modifies flac or alsa-lib or causes it to be > > > removed. None of the packages ``updates'' FC. By definition, > > > Fedora.Extras are not permitted to update FC. Again, your theory is > > > void..., FUD as Dag Wieers put it. Fact the facts or prove otherwise. > > > > > Dag did not call it FUD, That was Michael. > > GMail search only lists Dag. It is only his messages in which to find > the word ``FUD''. Latest quote from this thread: ``BTW if people > encounter problems with packages, they should report them. I'm sure > Axel's packages do not fail on fc3 and implying so without > verification is indeed FUD.'' Whether Axel or another repository, this > is exactly what applies to you. > <snip> > > > > > I understand it exactly, and my experience provided a stark example of > > that. > > No example, no session log, no bugzilla, just FUD. > > -- > Bernd ``who's getting bored of Jeff and who thinks installing > additional software on FC is still too hard if you are supposed to > search for software in unknown places'' R. > Bernd, Sorry to disillusion you, but this is the text of the message sent to me by Michael Schwendt on 11/30 Jeff, after a second person forwarded this to me, I feel the need to reply to your FUD: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:26:44 -0600 > Subject: Re: Fedora Extras is extra > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> <snip> > trying to remove some libraries that were required by installed > packages. I removed fedora.us from my list of repositories and the > update went flawlessly after that. I don't believe you. No package at fedora.us upgrades or downgrades any packages from Fedora Core. No package at fedora.us provides or obsoletes anything included within Fedora Core. All add-ons depend on Fedora Core. And of course, you have not kept any session log. Michael
