On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:31:37 -0600, Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 2. It tried to remove libaasound.so.2 and libFLAC.so.4 plus one other I > don't remember. All of which were required for one or more packages > already installed 'flac' and 'alsa-lib' are from FC, not Fedora.us. > 3. process of elimination identified the problem repo. > I removed repos, one at a time, and tried the update with each removal, > then re-added thttp://www.wellsfargo.com/hat repo and removed the next. > dag, newrpms, freshrpms, atrpms, then last fedora.us. That is a side-effect of repository-mixing. Some of the other repositories do upgrade or modify 'alsa-lib' and 'flac', Fedora.us doesn't. > > "Packages in Fedora Extras must not conflict with packages in > > Fedora Core." > > > > Fedora.US has some packages that do not meet this requirement. Your theory is void. -- Bernd
