On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 22:29 +0100, Bernd Radinger wrote: > On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:49:19 -0500, William M. Quarles <quarlewm@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > I put this back on list (which is a newsgroup for me). > > *oops* > > > >>Fedora Extras was supposed to be a community project from the beginning. > > >> It did not come from Red Hat like Fedora Core did. > > > > > > > > > Did you ever read fedora.redhat.com? ``Fedora Extras'' is part of Red > > > Hat's Fedora Project. But it does not exist yet. > > > > Yeah, and I haven't seen it on The Fedora Project website yet at all. > > http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/terminology.html <-- it's > explained right there > And one of the statements about Fedora Extras is: "Packages in Fedora Extras must not conflict with packages in Fedora Core." Fedora.US has some packages that do not meet this requirement. > > Apparently you haven't been to <http://www.fedora.us/> lately either, > > since that is where Fedora Extras currently exists. > > Did anybody disagree with that?! > > > Fedora Extras is not listed as one of the Fedora subprojects. > > <http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/> > > Fedora Core and Fedora Alternatives are not listed there either. ;-p > > > >>There should be a > > >>community on Fedora Extras now. And if this is a respected part of the > > >>Fedora Project, I am sure having a hard time finding the link from > > >>fedora.redhat.com to fedora.us. > > > > > > http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/ > > > > > > There you are. > > > > I don't see anything about Fedora Extras there either. > > Try once more. > > -- > Bernd >
