Re: Fedora Extras is extra

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx, jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: Fedora Extras is extra
• From: Bernd Radinger <bradinger@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:42:48 +0100
• Cc:
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=UyfRVriYMhxjgl386uvp3vsV5EiYHHfQ8RIN6ioU24jbns74R7qiUIDCqaL9peWwFSwQc+oMb2a4Gsp5zXjz1uTgY8+Pyunvg8OhfFwdpNoVS5LtoWsHOOpgM6jhAdpg6S6jI9pf6kiCRtoPGAJX2ppfGc1qAy0F0BUlelNxxUg=
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: Bernd Radinger <bradinger@xxxxxxxxx>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 20:37:01 -0600, Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> And one of the statements about Fedora Extras is:
> "Packages in Fedora Extras must not conflict with packages in Fedora
> Core."
> 
> Fedora.US has some packages that do not meet this requirement.

Which ones?

If you tried to install the fc2 packages on fc3, then that was your mistake.

-- 
Bernd

• References:
  • Fedora Extras is extra
    • From: William M. Quarles
  • Re: Fedora Extras is extra
    • From: Matthew Miller
  • Re: Fedora Extras is extra
    • From: Chris Stark
  • Re: Fedora Extras is extra
    • From: Matthew Miller
  • Re: Fedora Extras is extra
    • From: William M. Quarles
  • Re: Fedora Extras is extra
    • From: William M. Quarles
  • Re: Fedora Extras is extra
    • From: Bernd Radinger
  • Re: Fedora Extras is extra
    • From: Jeff Vian

• Prev by Date: Re: yum.conf for FC3?
• Next by Date: Re: CD burning problem has returned....
• Previous by thread: Re: Fedora Extras is extra
• Next by thread: Re: Fedora Extras is extra
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread