Re: Why no /proc/config.gz on FC-3 kernel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 27 Nov 2004, Dave Jones wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 05:01:45AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
>  
>  > > Name *one* good reason for doing /proc/config.gz over
>  > > Copying it to /boot/.   I've seen this proposed multiple
>  > > times (on-list and in bugzilla), and not seen a single compelling
>  > > reason to turn it on.
>  > 
>  > One good reason to do it is that you can be sure the config matches 
>  > exactly what is currently running.
> 
>  ls /boot/config-`uname -r`

It does not give the same guarantees as /proc/config.gz though, it may not 
even exist. I'm fine with the decision to do it as it is now, but you 
asked one good reason and I think that's one. Maybe it does not weigh in.

--   dag wieers,  dag@xxxxxxxxxx,  http://dag.wieers.com/   --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux