The server I'm planning on setting up is mainly for use on my Gigabit Ethernet LAN. I plan on using it mainly for storage and backups. Yea, I do have Apache running on another machine and will probably tie the two together. But the web site is a private family genealogy based system. Not a lot of bandwidth needed except for all of those photos. >From what I'm reading I think I'm hearing that I should blow off the PCI-X slots and go with a cheaper motherboard. This all would have been a mote point if 3Ware had had even one P4/PCI-X board listed on their compatibility list. Paul On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 00:21:52 +0000, James Wilkinson <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jeff Vian wrote: > > 480/1.54 is still almost 30 T1 volumes. NFS overhead pushes that a lot > > higher. > > Am I missing something? I don't think the Original Poster ever said that > all of this bandwidth was for *remote* access. > > I got the impression that the clients were supposed to be on the same > LAN. Gigabit Ethernet is practically entry-level these days. > > James. > > -- > E-mail address: james | A woodpigeon would, If a woodpigeon could, > @westexe.demon.co.uk | But a woodpigeon can't, So it won't. > | A woodpigeon could, If a woodpigeon would, > | But a woodpigeon doesn't want to. So it doesn't. > > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list >
