On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 18:21, James Wilkinson wrote: > Jeff Vian wrote: > > 480/1.54 is still almost 30 T1 volumes. NFS overhead pushes that a lot > > higher. > > Am I missing something? I don't think the Original Poster ever said that > all of this bandwidth was for *remote* access. > He never said either way. I was just pointing out the volume he is claiming he needs as throughput. > I got the impression that the clients were supposed to be on the same > LAN. Gigabit Ethernet is practically entry-level these days. > > James. > > -- > E-mail address: james | A woodpigeon would, If a woodpigeon could, > @westexe.demon.co.uk | But a woodpigeon can't, So it won't. > | A woodpigeon could, If a woodpigeon would, > | But a woodpigeon doesn't want to. So it doesn't.
