Dear Paul,
thanks for the source of the fredex's message. It made possible to me to see with my very eyes that some process along the way from our local mail server to my client is removing PGP signatures at least from messages coming from fedora-list. I'll investigate the same issue for other lists and general mail.
In more details, the same message appears to me (I mean I looked at the full source, even with vi to be sure) without PGP part. Many other headers are different, but I know the reason why for most of them.
Below, between dashed lines is the full source of the same message. Please note the message id, it's definitely the same message.
Best regards, and thanks again a lot. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return-Path: <fredex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Original-To: giuliano@localhost
Delivered-To: giuliano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Received: from localhost (giuliano [127.0.0.1])
by giuliano.iccu.sbn.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9378E30467
for <giuliano@localhost>; Fri, 3 Sep 2004 09:35:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dante.iccu.sbn.it [10.10.10.10]
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.5)
for giuliano@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 03 Sep 2004 09:35:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dante.iccu.sbn.it ([10.10.10.10]) by dante.iccu.sbn.it with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13)
id PZWTYTCC; Fri, 3 Sep 2004 02:14:32 +0200
Received: from 209.132.177.30 by dante.iccu.sbn.it (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Fri, 03 Sep 2004 02:14:31 +0200
Received: from hormel.redhat.com ([209.132.177.30]) by hormel.redhat.com
via smtpd (for dante.iccu.sbn.it [10.10.10.10]) with ESMTP; Fri, 3 Sep 2004 01:55:14 +0200
Received: from listman.util.phx.redhat.com (listman.util.phx.redhat.com [10.8.4.110])
by hormel.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id EE4E37348D; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:12:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com
[172.16.52.254])
by listman.util.phx.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
i830BsxO009531 for <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:11:55 -0400
Received: (from mail@localhost)
by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i830Bs915859
for fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:11:54 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31])
by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i830Bs315855
for <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:11:54 -0400
Received: from mx0.connactivity.com (mx0.connactivity.com [66.112.160.20])
by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i830BpS0032632
for <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:11:54 -0400
Received: from fcshome.stoneham.ma.us (5585-159-015.158.popsite.net
[66.217.159.15])
by mx0.connactivity.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i830BiZ28666
for <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:11:45 -0400
Received: from fcshome.stoneham.ma.us (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by fcshome.stoneham.ma.us (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
i830BhWs006314
for <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:11:43 -0400
Received: (from fredex@localhost)
by fcshome.stoneham.ma.us (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i830Bhg1006312
for fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:11:43 -0400
Message-ID: <20040903001143.GA6280@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: fredex <fredex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: How do I Maintain hard disk health
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 02:11:43 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Help: <mailto:fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>,<mailto:fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>,<mailto:fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C4914A.FCD85560"
Status: RO
X-UID: 28394
Content-Length: 2877
X-Keywords:
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_000_01C4914A.FCD85560 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
------_=_NextPart_000_01C4914A.FCD85560 Content-Type: message/rfc822
Subject: Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 09:34:57 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_002_01C4914A.FCD85560"
------_=_NextPart_002_01C4914A.FCD85560 Content-Type: text/plain
------_=_NextPart_002_01C4914A.FCD85560 Content-Type: text/plain; name="ATT487812.txt" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="ATT487812.txt"
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 10:47:26AM -0500, Steve Bergman wrote:
Well, there's SMARTD. I haven't used it. I'm thinking about starting
though.
It used to be that IDE hard drive failures were a rarity. In the last couple of months or so, I've seen 3 drives die. One was a couple months old. (hitachi deskstar 61GB) The other two were 2 years old. Interestingly, they were both Western Digital 20GB drives in a hardware raid1 configuration. They failed within a couple of weeks of each other. They both show to be dead even when put into a totally different machine, and new drives in the original machine fixed the problems, so I don't think its a controller issue.
In my own personal machines, I have always used Maxtors and never had a single failure, though.
Anyone having similar experiences?
We've got a bunch of maxtors around here, and there are also a bunch at work. So far this year I've seen 4 or 5 of 'em die within the 3-year warranty (note that their warranty is now 1 year on most drives), though there are several more approaching 3 years that are still humming along.
On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 08:34 -0700, Michael Marsh wrote:
> Help!
> > I run fedora as a samba server and have just recovered from my second
> hard disk crash in only 8 months. Is there a way that i can monitor
> and fix hard disk health between disasters?
>
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
--
---- Fred Smith -- fredex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -----------------------------
"And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father,
Prince of Peace. Of the increase of his government there will be no end. He will reign on David's throne and over his kingdom, establishing and upholding
it with justice and righteousness from that time on and forever."
------------------------------- Isaiah 9:7 (niv) ------------------------------
------_=_NextPart_002_01C4914A.FCD85560--
------_=_NextPart_000_01C4914A.FCD85560--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Howarth wrote:
Andrea Giuliano wrote:
I'm using Mozilla 1.7.2, and I don't see GPG signatures in most of the posts I checked. For instance, all posts from Alexander Dalloz don't appear to have a GPG signature. I've also look at the full source of the messages, but I couldn't find a signature.
Let's take an actual example: look at the only one "Re: Changing Console Resolution!" by Alexander and the only one "Re: How do I Maintain hard disk healthI" by fredex.
Here's the raw message for that posting as it arrived at my server:
From fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx Fri Sep 3 01:12:05 2004
Return-Path: <fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from hormel.redhat.com (hormel.redhat.com [209.132.177.30])
by goalkeeper.city-fan.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i830C3Sl004843
for <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 3 Sep 2004 01:12:04 +0100
Received: from listman.util.phx.redhat.com (listman.util.phx.redhat.com [10.8.4.110])
by hormel.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 9648C72EBC; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:11:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com
[172.16.52.254])
by listman.util.phx.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
i830BsxO009531 for <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:11:55 -0400
Received: (from mail@localhost)
by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i830Bs915859
for fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:11:54 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31])
by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i830Bs315855
for <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:11:54 -0400
Received: from mx0.connactivity.com (mx0.connactivity.com [66.112.160.20])
by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i830BpS0032632
for <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:11:54 -0400
Received: from fcshome.stoneham.ma.us (5585-159-015.158.popsite.net
[66.217.159.15])
by mx0.connactivity.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i830BiZ28666
for <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:11:45 -0400
Received: from fcshome.stoneham.ma.us (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by fcshome.stoneham.ma.us (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
i830BhWs006314
for <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:11:43 -0400
Received: (from fredex@localhost)
by fcshome.stoneham.ma.us (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i830Bhg1006312
for fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:11:43 -0400
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:11:43 -0400
From: fredex <fredex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <20040903001143.GA6280@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-Followup-To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040902153406.24319.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<1094140046.12730.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1094140046.12730.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 0
X-loop: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: How do I Maintain hard disk health
X-BeenThere: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: junk
Reply-To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-Id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>,
<mailto:fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archives/fedora-list>
List-Post: <mailto:fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-Help: <mailto:fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>,
<mailto:fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1848291613=="
Sender: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
Errors-To: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
Received-SPF: pass (goalkeeper.city-fan.org: domain of redhat.com designates 209.132.177.30 as permitted sender) receiver=goalkeeper.city-fan.org; client-ip=209.132.177.30; helo=hormel.redhat.com; envelope-from=fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx; x-software=spfmilter 0.93 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/;
--===============1848291613== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2" Content-Disposition: inline
--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 10:47:26AM -0500, Steve Bergman wrote:
> Well, there's SMARTD. I haven't used it. I'm thinking about starting
> though. =20
>=20
> It used to be that IDE hard drive failures were a rarity. In the last
> couple of months or so, I've seen 3 drives die. One was a couple months
> old. (hitachi deskstar 61GB) The other two were 2 years old.
> Interestingly, they were both Western Digital 20GB drives in a hardware
> raid1 configuration. They failed within a couple of weeks of each
> other. They both show to be dead even when put into a totally different
> machine, and new drives in the original machine fixed the problems, so I
> don't think its a controller issue.
>=20
> In my own personal machines, I have always used Maxtors and never had a
> single failure, though.
>=20
> Anyone having similar experiences?
We've got a bunch of maxtors around here, and there are also a bunch at work. So far this year I've seen 4 or 5 of 'em die within the 3-year warranty (note that their warranty is now 1 year on most drives), though there are several more approaching 3 years that are still humming along.
>=20 > On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 08:34 -0700, Michael Marsh wrote: > > Help! > >=20 > > I run fedora as a samba server and have just recovered from my second > > hard disk crash in only 8 months. Is there a way that i can monitor > > and fix hard disk health between disasters? > >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
--=20
---- Fred Smith -- fredex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --------------------------=
---
"And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Fathe=
r,
Prince of Peace. Of the increase of his government there will be no end. =
He=20
will reign on David's throne and over his kingdom, establishing and uphold=
ing
it with justice and righteousness from that time on and forever."
------------------------------- Isaiah 9:7 (niv) --------------------------=
----
--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBN7a/wkl39+p0CJ4RAopFAJ9KERhjUe2mUoRA2Y0sB46QAfpD8gCfXLuJ cLFEH+POqMvJBh6YhL/xNtI= =vt0H -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2--
--===============1848291613== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
--===============1848291613==--
> I don't see a signature there, even looking at
the sources. If you see a signature there instead, something here is going wrong, from my glasses down to our mail server...
Really hope it's not my glasses' fault, I changed them last week!!!
Perhaps there's still time to get the glasses replaced? ;-)
Cheers, Paul.
-- Andrea Giuliano, Ph. D. ICCU - Istituto Centrale per il Catalogo Unico Viale Castro Pretorio 105, Rome - ITALY Tel. +39064989509, Fax +39064059302
