Re: non-gecko-based browser - Opera

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 22:39:37 -0400 (EDT), Joe(theWordy)Philbrook <jtwdyp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Actually I'm glad to hear that Opera is available for FC1 <see below> But
I'm even gladder to hear that it's not based on gecko. (actually I LIKE the
gecko engine, but my whole point was that until/unless ALL browsers use
the same exact standards, I wanted choices.


I've used Opera (occasionally) on my Mandrake 9.1 installation before.
I suppose I read too much into the first part of the browser
identification part of the help->about menu choice I get there.

-> Browser identification
-> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Linux 2.4.21-0.13mdk i686) Opera 7.11 [en]


I'd have to agree that it is innovative, though in my case I was
frustrated by it. I remember having a hard time learning how to avoid
it's stealing part of my screen width for that pesky sidebar... I do not
like my primary text window to ever have less than 100 percent of the
available screen width. I can't stop web designers from using frames or
tables to do that to my view of the text on their page, but when "my own
software" does it to me, I have to concentrate real hard to stop an
instant <Alt>+<F4> reflex... And I really like the Mozilla/firefox "type
ahead" keyboard link indexing plus the ability to quickly change the
displayed font size with <ctrl>+<+> & <ctrl>+<-> shortcuts. Still for
occasional use I liked having opera installed.

However, I wasn't aware I could get it for fedora. At least not in a
package that I could get yum to update anyway...

Best place for alot of things is right from the horse's mouth :)

http://www.opera.com/download/

It should detect you have linux installed and will taked you to the linux download
list. They have there a list of pre-compiled rpm's, but only up to redhat 9 that I
notice. In any case, I've never used the shared versions which are distro
dependant. Grab the static version. It contains all the libraries needed within
the binary file (as opposed to shared which uses shared libraries on your
system - hence distro dependant). Since you are only ever running one instance of
opera there really is no disadvantage with the static version (that I know of).


One of the things I love about Opera is its design philosophy, which is the same
reason I use Enlightenment as a desktop - everything is configurable
and if you dont want something there, you can move it, float it, or just blow it
away if you like. It's all about providing you with the choice, not making the
choices for you.


For instance the bar on the left that you mentioned, clicking on
View -> Hotlist gives you a few options. I float it so it sits there just
like another web page (hidden behind the other tabs unless I bring it up).
You can also have it off if you please.

The browser identification you were talking about is interesting. Opera gives you
the option of letting your browser identify itself to javascripting sniffers as
something other than Opera if you want. Especially useful for poorly scripted pages
which sniff *only* for Netscape and IE and will kick you out if you are not either.
(much better html sniffs to see what javascripting capabilities you have rather than
sniff your actual browser version) Opera renders every page bar one or two that
I've ever been to fine (usually IE javascripting like someone mentioned earlier).
I had a mathematics publisher's web site kick me out once - I came back in under
the guise of good ol' IE and managed to navigate their site fine.


http://www.opera.com/support/tutorials/opera/

Gives all the tips on customising and navigating around the interface you need.

Cheers,
Daniel

--
email:snorri_dj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://members.optusnet.com.au/stonierd/



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux