----- Original Message ----- From: <fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 5:58 PM Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 1, Issue 1446 Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx You can reach the person managing the list at fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: vpn on FC1 (Ernesto Celis) 2. KDE 3.2 (Steve Waggitt) 3. Re: How to unset up the firewall... :-) (Alexander Dalloz) 4. Re: Re: DNS Woes (stucklenp@xxxxxxxxxxx) 5. Re: alsa modules loaded but alsamixer won't work (Gavin Henry) 6. Fedora Core 2 release??? (Bernd Kauling) 7. Re: Fedora Core 2 release??? (Bart Kalita) 8. Re: DNS Woes (Jeff Vian) 9. Re: DNS Woes (Jeff Vian) 10. Re: How to unset up the firewall... :-) (Fabr?cio Santos) 11. Re: How to unset up the firewall... :-) (jludwig) 12. Re: How to unset up the firewall... :-) (Alexander Dalloz) 13. Re: Re: DNS Woes (stucklenp@xxxxxxxxxxx) 14. Re: OpenGl Ati (Tom 'Needs A Hat' Mitchell) 15. Re: Re: DNS Woes (jludwig) 16. Re: DNS Woes (Aaron Matteson) 17. Re: OpenGl Ati (Mike Atamas) 18. Re: Fedora Core 2 release??? (Bernd Kauling) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 17:54:46 -0600 From: Ernesto Celis <celisdelafuente@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: vpn on FC1 To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <1080431686.20675.11.camel@litux> Content-Type: text/plain > Hi all, > > We need secure remote access to a few TCP servers running > on our FC1 host. These include pop3,imap,pserver(cvs) and > telnetd. The clients are both based on XP and FC1. > > I think that SSH is perfect for that task but I first want > to be sure that it will run fine on FC1. SSH does a great job when remote management is needed. I have a web & ftp server running fedora core 1 at work since january, and I do remote administration from my FC1 box at home througt pptpclient and SSH, the VPN server on my work network is NT and I'll do remote administration from Windows Pc's using PuTTY when I'm in the office. Cheers Ernesto ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:21:09 +0000 From: Steve Waggitt <steve.m.waggitt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: KDE 3.2 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <200403280021.10177.steve.m.waggitt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I've been trying to get apt configured so that I can upgrade to KDE 3.2. I've tried following the instructions on the KDE Red Hat pages but keep getting a failed message when updating the package lists with apt. Any help would be appreciated. ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 01:28:41 +0100 From: Alexander Dalloz <alexander.dalloz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: How to unset up the firewall... :-) To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1080433720.7065.499.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Am So, den 28.03.2004 schrieb FabrÃcio Santos um 00:41: > Viva Alexander, > > Thanks for your answer. > Fedora is behind the router. Hence the packet trace showing a source IP on > the internet 13.13.13.13 and the destination 192.168.1.1 as port forwarding > had already been applied. It may be a bit confusing but my router is not > 192.168.1.1... :-) It was the router before I got myself a wireless router > switch and it kept using that same IP after that. Fedora behind a router ... So it is clear that the router has to forward the ports 6666 and 8080 to the Fedora box. Is that working? > I'm really clueless here... :-/ so thanks in advance for any help. > > PS. I hope formating will be ok now... O:-) And sorry for the long email. Thank you, plain text is perfect. :) > -fs Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13 Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.4.22-1.2174.nptl Sirendipity 01:26:01 up 8 days, 10:08, load average: 0.01, 0.02, 0.05 [ Î"νÏ?θι Ïf'αÏ.Ï"ον - gnothi seauton ] my life is a planetarium - and you are the stars -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil Url : /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040328/dc6e8606/attachment.bin ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 0:43:07 +0000 From: <stucklenp@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Re: DNS Woes To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <200403280043.i2S0h7Ds058087@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Mark: route -n yields Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use IFace 24.159.200.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 lo 0.0.0.0 24.159.200.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 eth0 "route print" on Windoze yields: Active Routes: Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 24.159.200.1 24.159.201.xxx 20 24.159.200.0 255.255.252.0 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 20 24.159.201.xxx 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 20 24.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 20 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 20 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 1 Default Gateway: 24.159.200.1 where "24.159.201.xxx" is the leased IP. Thanks for any assistance. Paul > > From: Mark Neidorff <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: 2004/03/27 Sat PM 05:54:13 GMT > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: DNS Woes > > There is a lot of information missing here. > > I assuming you are using fedora. > Are you using webmin? > What happens when you run (as root) route -n ? Is your gateway listed? Is > it correct? > > Lets start there. > > Mark > > On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 stucklenp@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > I have a challenge: since running "yum update" and blindly accepting all the packages and then rebooting, I have not been able to get my Fedora box on the Web. Since that system is my firewall box it is really important that I get it running again. Note that I get the same symptoms with or without the firewall running. > > > > The NIC is configured to "Automatically obtain IP address settings with DHCP" and "Automatically obtain DNS information from provider" (I have tried manually setting DNS addresses as well.) > > > > When the network service is started, the NIC does get a valid IP from the ISP, as verified by the ISP. As well, I see the lease information in the messages log. > > "...dhclient: bound to <myIP> -- renual in 13961 seconds... > > ifup: done... > > network: Bringing up interface etho: succeeded" > > > > > > Other Symptoms: > > ping <external IP> results in "Destination port Unreachable." > > ping <leased IP> Works fine. > > > > Redhat Network Configuration show the NIC active and "ok" > > resolve.conf contains the correct IPs for the ISP's DNS servers. > > > > To add insult to injury, when I plug my Windoze box into the cable modem and set its IP to use DHCP, I have no problem attaching to the Web. > > > > Any ideas as to how I can resolve this? > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > -- > Sign over a gynecologist's office: "Dr. Jones, at your cervix." > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:52:17 +0000 From: Gavin Henry <gavin.henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: alsa modules loaded but alsamixer won't work To: gongolas@xxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <200403280052.22205.gavin.henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 25 Mar 2004 02:20, S. Gongola wrote: > I've loaded ALSA rpms and the alsa modules are loaded. > Sound works through oss emulation but when I run alsamixer. > alsamixer: function snd_ctl_open failed for default: No such file or > directory Has anyone had a similar problem. This might be due to bad permissions in /dev/snd/* as root run: chmod a+rw /dev/snd/* It should be fine after this. - -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. http://www.magicfx.co.uk http://FedoraNEWS.ORG/ghenry http://www.suretecsystems.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAZiHFgNqd7Kng8UoRAqkoAKCzEnCTOjcozOgfpjZhLut9ZgjexgCeNGEw rnp71vaFxJabirp1h1KtZCY= =FrQ+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: 28 Mar 2004 03:02:46 +0200 From: Bernd Kauling <bkauling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Fedora Core 2 release??? To: "fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1080435766.3985.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain Hi everybody i just wanted to ask, if there is a release date for fedora core 2 known. I can't find any information on the fedora site of the next release date. regards: Bernd ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 02:05:32 +0100 From: Bart Kalita <bartk@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Fedora Core 2 release??? To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <406624DC.6020504@xxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/schedule/ Bernd Kauling wrote: >Hi everybody > >i just wanted to ask, if there is a release date for fedora core 2 >known. > >I can't find any information on the fedora site of the next release >date. > >regards: Bernd > > > > -- ____________________________________________________ Bart Kalita MCP Registered Linux user #347493 Fedora Core 2 www.bart-domain.com www.astradine.no-ip.org ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 19:07:27 -0600 From: Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: DNS Woes To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <4066254F.9000102@xxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed stucklenp@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >Mark: > >route -n yields >Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use IFace >24.159.200.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 0 0 eth0 >127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 lo >0.0.0.0 24.159.200.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 eth0 > >"route print" on Windoze yields: >Active Routes: >Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 24.159.200.1 24.159.201.xxx 20 > 24.159.200.0 255.255.252.0 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 20 > 24.159.201.xxx 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 20 > 24.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 20 > 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 20 > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 1 >Default Gateway: 24.159.200.1 > >where "24.159.201.xxx" is the leased IP. > >Thanks for any assistance. > >Paul > > > 1. An earlier suggestion was to power off then back on the modem. Have you done that? 2. What is the output of 'ifconfig eth0' ? Does it match the 24.159.201.xxx above? 3. Can you ping the eth0 address? I have at times had to power off then back on the modem, followed by 'service network restart' when my cable ISP went braindead. That sequence usually works. Jeff ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 19:08:54 -0600 From: Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: DNS Woes To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <406625A6.5060500@xxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed stucklenp@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >Mark: > >route -n yields >Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use IFace >24.159.200.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 0 0 eth0 >127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 lo >0.0.0.0 24.159.200.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 eth0 > >"route print" on Windoze yields: >Active Routes: >Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 24.159.200.1 24.159.201.xxx 20 > 24.159.200.0 255.255.252.0 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 20 > 24.159.201.xxx 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 20 > 24.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 20 > 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 20 > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 1 >Default Gateway: 24.159.200.1 > >where "24.159.201.xxx" is the leased IP. > >Thanks for any assistance. > >Paul > I forgot to ask if you can ping the gateway (24.159.200.1) ?? > > > > ------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 03:09:03 +0200 From: Fabr?cio Santos <fabricio.santos@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: How to unset up the firewall... :-) To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <00f501c41461$d128c5f0$0201a8c0@sereia> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > Fedora behind a router ... So it is clear that the router has to forward > the ports 6666 and 8080 to the Fedora box. Is that working? Thanks for your help... I just solved the problem. I was being a bit dumb as there was no default route defined... I had not tried to connect from Fedora to anywhere else other than my local network yet because it is meant to be a server only... :-D LOL When I tried to do a wget to the Internet I got nowhere and "route" showed me the light... :-/ But the annoying thing is the result is similar to a firewall that drops the packets. :-) Anyway, my interface was set up by DHCP and I'm not sure if the default gateway should also be aquired using this protocol. Obviously this was not the case... For now I have done it manually but if anyone knows a way of automating this task. Otherwise I will just add the "route add default gw 192.168.1.5" at the end of the S10network rc script start section. Thanks! -fs ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:18:43 -0500 From: jludwig <wralphie@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: How to unset up the firewall... :-) To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1080436722.3447.5.camel@xxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain There are a bunch of kernel level filtering and routing 'setups' that are disconnected from the firewall (see /proc/sys/net/ipv4/) Including tcp_syscookies etc. -- jludwig <wralphie@xxxxxxxxxxx> ------------------------------ Message: 12 Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 03:21:25 +0200 From: Alexander Dalloz <alexander.dalloz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: How to unset up the firewall... :-) To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1080436885.7065.501.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Am So, den 28.03.2004 schrieb FabrÃcio Santos um 03:09: > Anyway, my interface was set up by DHCP and I'm not sure if the default > gateway should also be aquired using this protocol. Obviously this was not > the case... For now I have done it manually but if anyone knows a way of > automating this task. Otherwise I will just add the "route add default gw > 192.168.1.5" at the end of the S10network rc script start section. GATEWAY is to be set in /etc/sysconfig/network. > Thanks! > > -fs Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13 Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.4.22-1.2174.nptl Sirendipity 03:20:47 up 8 days, 11:02, load average: 0.06, 0.11, 0.08 [ Î"νÏ?θι Ïf'αÏ.Ï"ον - gnothi seauton ] my life is a planetarium - and you are the stars -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil Url : /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040328/ddfc72a3/attachment.bin ------------------------------ Message: 13 Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 1:29:50 +0000 From: <stucklenp@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Re: DNS Woes To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <200403280129.i2S1Toec002296@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sorry... forgot to answer that one. I was instructed by the ISP to power-down the cable modem for one hour and did so. The problem still exists only with the Linux system, but not with the Windoze system. Linux (Fedora) can not ping the gateway or any other IP on the outside world; it can ping the NIC IP assigned by the ISP. ifconfig eth0 does not have the leased IP (24.159.201.xxx) in its output lines, only what I have shown below. Paul > > From: Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: 2004/03/28 Sun AM 01:07:27 GMT > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: DNS Woes > > > > stucklenp@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > >Mark: > > > >route -n yields > >Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use IFace > >24.159.200.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 0 0 eth0 > >127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 lo > >0.0.0.0 24.159.200.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 eth0 > > > >"route print" on Windoze yields: > >Active Routes: > >Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric > > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 24.159.200.1 24.159.201.xxx 20 > > 24.159.200.0 255.255.252.0 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 20 > > 24.159.201.xxx 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 20 > > 24.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 20 > > 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 > > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 20 > > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 1 > >Default Gateway: 24.159.200.1 > > > >where "24.159.201.xxx" is the leased IP. > > > >Thanks for any assistance. > > > >Paul > > > > > > > 1. An earlier suggestion was to power off then back on the modem. Have > you done that? > > 2. What is the output of 'ifconfig eth0' ? Does it match the > 24.159.201.xxx above? > > 3. Can you ping the eth0 address? > > I have at times had to power off then back on the modem, followed by > 'service network restart' when my cable ISP went braindead. That > sequence usually works. > > Jeff > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > ------------------------------ Message: 14 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 17:35:16 -0800 From: "Tom 'Needs A Hat' Mitchell" <mitch48@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: OpenGl Ati To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <20040328013516.GB26487@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 05:07:54PM -0500, Mike Atamas wrote: > Reply-To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I am using the properiety ati drivers. When I installed them everything > worked fine. Now it tells me Error: couldn't get fbconfig when I try to > run fgl_glxgears and all opengl things barely crawl. What is the problem? How does the ati driver interact with the Mesa GL stuff? With nVidia if the wrong library was found things break or go so slow you think they are broken. I would suggest a revisit of the ati install process. -- T o m M i t c h e l l /dev/null the ultimate in secure storage. ------------------------------ Message: 15 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:36:43 -0500 From: jludwig <wralphie@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Re: DNS Woes To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1080437802.3447.22.camel@xxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain >From the command line add route add default gateway 24.159.200.1 dev eth0. There are some GUI network setups under System Settings. I can't seem to remember where to permanently set static routes. -- jludwig <wralphie@xxxxxxxxxxx> ------------------------------ Message: 16 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 17:37:12 -0800 From: Aaron Matteson <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: DNS Woes To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <20040328013712.19699.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Jeff Vian became daring and sent these 1.6K bytes, > > > stucklenp@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > >Mark: > > > >route -n yields > >Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use > >IFace > >24.159.200.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 0 0 eth0 > >127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 lo > >0.0.0.0 24.159.200.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 eth0 > > > >"route print" on Windoze yields: > >Active Routes: > >Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric > > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 24.159.200.1 24.159.201.xxx 20 > > 24.159.200.0 255.255.252.0 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 20 > > 24.159.201.xxx 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 20 > > 24.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 20 > > 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 > > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 20 > > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx 1 > >Default Gateway: 24.159.200.1 > > > >where "24.159.201.xxx" is the leased IP. > > > 1. An earlier suggestion was to power off then back on the modem. Have > you done that? Fixed the problem for me. > 2. What is the output of 'ifconfig eth0' ? Does it match the > 24.159.201.xxx above? > > 3. Can you ping the eth0 address? > > I have at times had to power off then back on the modem, followed by > 'service network restart' when my cable ISP went braindead. That > sequence usually works. -- 0 1 0 Aaron M Matteson - GnuPG:0xD144B7FF 0 0 1 Real programmers don't document. If it was hard to write, 1 1 1 it should be hard to understand! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ http://cryptosystem.us/ - Project http://cryptosystem.us/blog/ - Blog http://mindstorm.ath.cx:8080/ - Wiki ------------------------------ Message: 17 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:40:57 -0500 From: Mike Atamas <psychomohel@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: OpenGl Ati To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <40662D29.5030105@xxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed I have fixed the problem. It happened during an update when Mesa GL was updated. It overwrote the libGL provided by ati. All it took was to reinstall the drivers and reboot ( dont know why that helped ) Mike Tom 'Needs A Hat' Mitchell wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 05:07:54PM -0500, Mike Atamas wrote: > >>Reply-To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >>I am using the properiety ati drivers. When I installed them everything >>worked fine. Now it tells me Error: couldn't get fbconfig when I try to >>run fgl_glxgears and all opengl things barely crawl. What is the problem? > > > How does the ati driver interact with the Mesa GL stuff? > > With nVidia if the wrong library was found things break or go > so slow you think they are broken. > > I would suggest a revisit of the ati install process. > > ------------------------------ Message: 18 Date: 28 Mar 2004 03:58:14 +0200 From: Bernd Kauling <bkauling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Fedora Core 2 release??? To: bartk@xxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1080439094.3985.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain Thank you. it's very embarassing, that i hadn't found this ^^ regards: Bernd ------------------------------ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 1, Issue 1446 ********************************************
