----- Original Message ----- From: <fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 3:43 PM Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 1, Issue 1445 Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx You can reach the person managing the list at fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: OT Sorry!! (Alexander Dalloz) 2. vpn on FC1 (Pierre De Boeck) 3. Re: OT Sorry!! (Aaron Matteson) 4. Re: vpn on FC1 (Alexander Dalloz) 5. Re: Re: asus A7V600-X (david_pettersson@xxxxxxxxxxxx) 6. Re: new memory = more swap? (John Thompson) 7. Re: vpn on FC1 (Brian Chase) 8. Re: Able to scan but not print through hpoj (Philip A. Chapman) 9. CD Writers and Yum Upgrading from FC1 to FC2 (Charles Curley) 10. Re: OT Sorry!! (William Hooper) 11. OpenGl Ati (Mike Atamas) 12. RE: vpn on FC1 (Pierre De Boeck) 13. Re: OT Sorry!! (Aaron Matteson) 14. Re: DNS Woes (Mark Neidorff) 15. Re: UptoDate (Wayde C. Gutman) 16. Re: UptoDate (William Hooper) 17. Re: How to unset up the firewall... :-) (Fabr?cio Santos) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 21:49:44 +0100 From: Alexander Dalloz <alexander.dalloz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: OT Sorry!! To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1080420583.7065.484.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Am Sa, den 27.03.2004 schrieb Aaron Matteson um 21:31: > The only frontend to yum that i know of is up2date, but i don't think > that what you had in mind :) up2date is NO yum frontend! up2date can make use of yum repositories, that's all. Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13 Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.4.22-1.2174.nptl Sirendipity 21:48:48 up 8 days, 6:30, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.07 [ Î"νÏ?θι Ïf'αÏ.Ï"ον - gnothi seauton ] my life is a planetarium - and you are the stars -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil Url : /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040327/2cb6ecd5/attachment.bin ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 21:53:21 +0100 From: "Pierre De Boeck" <pierre.deboeck@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: vpn on FC1 To: "Fedora" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <FOEMJNHPBPCDOPEBOPOMGEFHFAAA.pierre.deboeck@xxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi all, We need secure remote access to a few TCP servers running on our FC1 host. These include pop3,imap,pserver(cvs) and telnetd. The clients are both based on XP and FC1. I think that SSH is perfect for that task but I first want to be sure that it will run fine on FC1. ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 13:08:10 -0800 From: Aaron Matteson <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: OT Sorry!! To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <20040327210810.13447.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Alexander Dalloz became daring and sent these 1.6K bytes, > Am Sa, den 27.03.2004 schrieb Aaron Matteson um 21:31: > > > The only frontend to yum that i know of is up2date, but i don't think > > that what you had in mind :) > > up2date is NO yum frontend! The effect is still the same, no? > up2date can make use of yum repositories, that's all. Perhaps i am wrong, but i would call soemthing that makes use of another somethings resources a front-end function. A front end makes use of a service, not neccissarily a front-end to the application. -- 0 1 0 Aaron M Matteson - GnuPG:0xD144B7FF 0 0 1 Real programmers don't document. If it was hard to write, 1 1 1 it should be hard to understand! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ http://cryptosystem.us/ - Ongoing project http://cryptosystem.us/blog/ - Blog http://mindstorm.ath.cx:8080/ - Home Wiki ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 22:18:57 +0100 From: Alexander Dalloz <alexander.dalloz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: vpn on FC1 To: pierre.deboeck@xxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1080422337.7065.489.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Am Sa, den 27.03.2004 schrieb Pierre De Boeck um 21:53: > Hi all, > > We need secure remote access to a few TCP servers running > on our FC1 host. These include pop3,imap,pserver(cvs) and > telnetd. The clients are both based on XP and FC1. > > I think that SSH is perfect for that task but I first want > to be sure that it will run fine on FC1. Do you want VPN or SSH connect? SSH of course works without problems on Fedora, both as server as well as client. You can use SSH for tunneling too, as a "lightweight" VPN. But I would highly recommend that you switch off every telnet daemon! And just use POP3S and IMAPS instead of the normal daemons without SSL/TLS encryption. Actual clients on Windows[tm] and Linux do support these secured services. Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13 Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.4.22-1.2174.nptl Sirendipity 22:15:38 up 8 days, 6:57, load average: 0.11, 0.06, 0.06 [ Î"νÏ?θι Ïf'αÏ.Ï"ον - gnothi seauton ] my life is a planetarium - and you are the stars -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil Url : /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040327/7d0d40c5/attachment.bin ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 21:23:01 +0000 From: <david_pettersson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Re: asus A7V600-X To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <20040327212301.FRPE3372.mxfep03.bredband.com@mxfep03> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > From: Alexander Dalloz <alexander.dalloz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: 2004/03/27 lö PM 04:50:48 GMT > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Ämne: Re: asus A7V600-X > > Thanks! Now it works. David. -------------- next part -------------- Skipped content of type multipart/signed ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 15:23:52 -0600 From: John Thompson <JohnThompson@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: new memory = more swap? To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <20040327152352.0b7610b1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 17:50:37 -0600 Kevin Krieser <kkrieser@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have 1 GB RAM on my Linux box, and 2 GB swap (0 of which is used). > But with 260GB of disk space on the computer, why not? I may want to > run a program that uses 2 GB sometime. I'm sure that won't be a problem. FWiW, I have 260GB disk space (5x47GB RAID array and 2x20GB single drives) and have never used all the 256MB swap partition I have. -- -John (JohnThompson@xxxxxxxxxx) ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 16:30:53 -0500 From: Brian Chase <networkr0@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: vpn on FC1 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <4065F28D.1070504@xxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed I agree, for selected services, just run the secure versions of IMAPS and POP3S(993/995), and SSH(22) and open up the perspective ports on your firewall. Forget telnet, it's superceded by SSH. If you find you're doing lots of other things that are inherently insecure like XDCMP for X terminals between sites and need a VPN for Fedora Core, I'd suggest OpenVPN. http://openvpn.sourceforge.net/ Cheers, Brian If you find you need lo Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am Sa, den 27.03.2004 schrieb Pierre De Boeck um 21:53: > >> Hi all, >> >>We need secure remote access to a few TCP servers running >>on our FC1 host. These include pop3,imap,pserver(cvs) and >>telnetd. The clients are both based on XP and FC1. >> >>I think that SSH is perfect for that task but I first want >>to be sure that it will run fine on FC1. > > > Do you want VPN or SSH connect? SSH of course works without problems on > Fedora, both as server as well as client. You can use SSH for tunneling > too, as a "lightweight" VPN. > > But I would highly recommend that you switch off every telnet daemon! > And just use POP3S and IMAPS instead of the normal daemons without > SSL/TLS encryption. Actual clients on Windows[tm] and Linux do support > these secured services. > > Alexander > > > -- Brian Chase Phone: 386-775-5366 2345 Hillside Ave. Fax: 309-276-2048 Orange City, FL 32763 Email: networkr0@xxxxxxxxxx http://openalternatives.net ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 15:31:19 -0600 From: "Philip A. Chapman" <pchapman@xxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Able to scan but not print through hpoj To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1080423078.12641.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Sat, 2004-03-27 at 10:52, Sarah Fish wrote: > I have a psc 1210 that had the same problem. first, Uninstall hpoj .90 > and get at least ver .91. I also uninstalled the sane front and back > ends and xsane and obtained updated versions from the sane website. Sarah You got me on the right track, but I took a different path. I downloaded hpoj-0.91-2.i386.rpm, hpoj-devel-0.91-2.i386.rpm, and xojpanel-091-2.i386.rpm from the Fedora Core 2 Test 1 packages. I did not download another version of sane, as the version I have seems to already be the latest. I did an rpm -U *.rpm. I had to re-run ptal-init setup; but otherwise it all works now. Scanning and printing! Thanks -- Philip A. Chapman Application Development: Java, Visual Basic (MCP), PostgreSQL, MySQL, MSSQL Linux, Windows 9x, Windows NT, Windows 2000, Windows XP -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040327/06d183d7/attachment.bin ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 14:41:01 -0700 From: Charles Curley <charlescurley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: CD Writers and Yum Upgrading from FC1 to FC2 To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <20040327214101.GB28260@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I used yum's upgrade option to upgrade a box from FC1 to FC2 test 1. It worked quite well except for the CD and CD-RW drives. This app note describes the problem and how to fix it below. I have not checked to see if an Anaconda upgrade or fresh installation requires this fix. The problem is that CD-RWs require the ide-SCSI emulator under kernel 2.4, but that went away in the 2.6 kernel. A Yum upgrade does not make the necessary changes. Do the following: * In your /boot/grub/grub.conf, remove any references to ide-scsi in stanzas for 2.6 kernels. My kernel stanza for 2.6.1 went from this (beware of line wrap): title Fedora Core (2.6.1-1.65) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.1-1.65 ro root=LABEL=/ hdc=ide-scsi hdb=ide-scsi initrd /initrd-2.6.1-1.65.img to this: title Fedora Core (2.6.1-1.65) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.1-1.65 ro root=LABEL=/ initrd /initrd-2.6.1-1.65.img * Fire up your CD-ROM burning software. I use xcdroast-0.98a14-2, which comes with FC2, so I'll give instructions for that. In "Setup", rescan your hardware. Save the configuration. You may get a pop-up window complaining that IDE devices are slow. Oh well. That should do it. Try burning a CD-RW to verify that everything is working correctly. If you run "cdrecord -scanbus", it will fail and complain. It works anyway when you use xcdroast as a front end. For more information on how to perform an upgrade using yum, see "Some Notes on yum Repositories", http://www.charlescurley.com/yum.html -- Charles Curley /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign Looking for fine software \ / Respect for open standards and/or writing? X No HTML/RTF in email http://www.charlescurley.com / \ No M$ Word docs in email Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0 809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040327/25127689/attachment.bin ------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 16:51:30 -0500 (EST) From: "William Hooper" <whooperhsd3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: OT Sorry!! To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <65278.65.41.50.216.1080424290.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Aaron Matteson said: > >> up2date can make use of yum repositories, that's all. > > Perhaps i am wrong, but i would call soemthing that makes use of another > somethings resources a front-end function. So up2date is a front end to apt? > A front end makes use of a > service, not neccissarily a front-end to the application. You have a weird definition of "front-end". You would say Mozilla is a httpd "front-end"? Or Samba is a Win2000 "front-end"? Up2date can use apt or yum repositories, but uses neither the apt or yum program. -- William Hooper ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 17:07:54 -0500 From: Mike Atamas <psychomohel@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: OpenGl Ati To: Fedora List <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <4065FB3A.3010503@xxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed I am using the properiety ati drivers. When I installed them everything worked fine. Now it tells me Error: couldn't get fbconfig when I try to run fgl_glxgears and all opengl things barely crawl. What is the problem? Thanks Mike psychomohel@xxxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------ Message: 12 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 23:29:34 +0100 From: "Pierre De Boeck" <pierre.deboeck@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: vpn on FC1 To: "Alexander Dalloz" <alexander.dalloz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <pierre.deboeck@xxxxxxxxx>, "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <FOEMJNHPBPCDOPEBOPOMGEFJFAAA.pierre.deboeck@xxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > Do you want VPN or SSH connect? SSH of course works without problems on > Fedora, both as server as well as client. You can use SSH for tunneling > too, as a "lightweight" VPN. > > But I would highly recommend that you switch off every telnet daemon! > And just use POP3S and IMAPS instead of the normal daemons without > SSL/TLS encryption. Actual clients on Windows[tm] and Linux do support > these secured services. I suppose that the S version are just the normal one over a TLS channel, with Client authentication. But I thought about SSH and a secure telnet for remote management like password changes. ------------------------------ Message: 13 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 14:38:28 -0800 From: Aaron Matteson <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: OT Sorry!! To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <20040327223828.15748.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii William Hooper became daring and sent these 0.7K bytes, > > Aaron Matteson said: > > > >> up2date can make use of yum repositories, that's all. > > > > Perhaps i am wrong, but i would call soemthing that makes use of another > > somethings resources a front-end function. > > So up2date is a front end to apt? > > > A front end makes use of a > > service, not neccissarily a front-end to the application. > > You have a weird definition of "front-end". You would say Mozilla is a > httpd "front-end"? Or Samba is a Win2000 "front-end"? > > Up2date can use apt or yum repositories, but uses neither the apt or yum > program. Ok, my opinions seem to have been pretty skewed lately, sorry for the problems, i guess i need more sleep. -- 0 1 0 Aaron M Matteson - GnuPG:0xD144B7FF 0 0 1 Real programmers don't document. If it was hard to write, 1 1 1 it should be hard to understand! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ http://cryptosystem.us/ - Project http://cryptosystem.us/blog/ - Blog http://mindstorm.ath.cx:8080/ - Wiki ------------------------------ Message: 14 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 17:54:13 +0000 (UTC) From: Mark Neidorff <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: DNS Woes To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0403271751260.12837-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII There is a lot of information missing here. I assuming you are using fedora. Are you using webmin? What happens when you run (as root) route -n ? Is your gateway listed? Is it correct? Lets start there. Mark On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 stucklenp@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > I have a challenge: since running "yum update" and blindly accepting all the packages and then rebooting, I have not been able to get my Fedora box on the Web. Since that system is my firewall box it is really important that I get it running again. Note that I get the same symptoms with or without the firewall running. > > The NIC is configured to "Automatically obtain IP address settings with DHCP" and "Automatically obtain DNS information from provider" (I have tried manually setting DNS addresses as well.) > > When the network service is started, the NIC does get a valid IP from the ISP, as verified by the ISP. As well, I see the lease information in the messages log. > "...dhclient: bound to <myIP> -- renual in 13961 seconds... > ifup: done... > network: Bringing up interface etho: succeeded" > > > Other Symptoms: > ping <external IP> results in "Destination port Unreachable." > ping <leased IP> Works fine. > > Redhat Network Configuration show the NIC active and "ok" > resolve.conf contains the correct IPs for the ISP's DNS servers. > > To add insult to injury, when I plug my Windoze box into the cable modem and set its IP to use DHCP, I have no problem attaching to the Web. > > Any ideas as to how I can resolve this? > > Thanks > > > -- Sign over a gynecologist's office: "Dr. Jones, at your cervix." ------------------------------ Message: 15 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 16:23:28 -0700 From: "Wayde C. Gutman" <waydecgutman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: UptoDate To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <40660CF0.9020701@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed From my understanding, uptodate is for Red Hats's .rpm and apt-get is for Debian's .deb packages, and Slackware uses the old .tar.gz/.tgz type of packages. Not really interchangeable, although, the .tar.gz/.tgz packages could be called universal if you don't mind the ./configure>./make>./make install routine that goes along with it. There is a tool called Alien that is used to install .rpm packages on a .deb based distro and vice versa. ------------------------------ Message: 16 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 18:28:42 -0500 (EST) From: "William Hooper" <whooperhsd3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: UptoDate To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <64629.65.41.50.216.1080430122.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Wayde C. Gutman said: > From my understanding, uptodate is for Red Hats's .rpm and apt-get is > for Debian's .deb packages, Apt has been ported to RPM based systems for a while now. -- William Hooper ------------------------------ Message: 17 Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:41:20 +0100 From: Fabr?cio Santos <fabricio.santos@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: How to unset up the firewall... :-) To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <002201c41455$048187f0$0201a8c0@sereia> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Viva Alexander, Thanks for your answer. > Please, do NOT send HTML to the list! Your wish is my command... I couldn't find the option for doing so in Yahoo mail so here I go with my home email... > Is your Fedora machine a router for you or behind a router? > Is then SSH and HTTPD running directly connected to the > net or behind a router? Fedora is behind the router. Hence the packet trace showing a source IP on the internet 13.13.13.13 and the destination 192.168.1.1 as port forwarding had already been applied. It may be a bit confusing but my router is not 192.168.1.1... :-) It was the router before I got myself a wireless router switch and it kept using that same IP after that. > You can check which iptables rules are active by issuing the command > "iptables -L -v -n". If you run a "service iptables stop" then under > default circumstances there should be no rule left and filtering. > > Alexander I didn't really look at the iptables man page but when I try the command you gave me I believe everything seems to be ok and all kinds of traffic should be accepted: =============================================== [root@somehost root]# iptables -L -v -n Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination =============================================== But nevertheless connects are still not responded too (using tethereal this time as the output is more readable): =============================================== [root@somehost root]# tethereal -n port 8080 Capturing on eth0 0.000000 13.13.13.13 -> 192.168.1.1 TCP 42443 > 8080 [SYN] Seq=953358288 Ack=0 Win=5840 Len=0 2.994874 13.13.13.13 -> 192.168.1.1 TCP 42443 > 8080 [SYN] Seq=953358288 Ack=0 Win=5840 Len=0 =============================================== If I stop iptables using the init.d script: =============================================== [root@somehost root]# /etc/init.d/iptables stop Flushing firewall rules: [ OK ] Setting chains to policy ACCEPT: filter [ OK ] Unloading iptables modules: [ OK ] =============================================== I still get the same result and no answer to the TCP SYNs. Now, if I try it from inside my network it works fine: =============================================== [root@somehost root]# tethereal port 8080 Capturing on eth0 0.000000 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.1 TCP 1958 > webcache [SYN] Seq=1296792560 Ack=0 Win=64512 Len=0 0.000142 192.168.1.1 -> 192.168.1.2 TCP webcache > 1958 [SYN, ACK] Seq=947748956 Ack=1296792561 Win=5840 Len=0 0.000328 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.1 TCP 1958 > webcache [ACK] Seq=1296792561 Ack=947748957 Win=64512 Len=0 0.000686 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.1 HTTP GET /ddb/ HTTP/1.1 ... =============================================== In this set of examples I used HTTP for testing and only change I did to the HTTPD config was adding this virtual host session to the end of httpd.conf: =============================================== NameVirtualHost 192.168.1.1:8080 <VirtualHost 192.168.1.1:8080> ServerAdmin fabricio.santos@xxxxxxxxxxx DocumentRoot /var/www/html/somehost ServerName somehost.homeip.net ServerAlias somehost.homeip.net ErrorLog logs/somehost.homeip.net-error_log CustomLog logs/somehost.homeip.net-access_log common </VirtualHost> =============================================== And besides I get the same result when using SSH on port 6666. For SSH the only change I did was to add a line in the /etc/init.d/sshd script: =============================================== OPTIONS="-p 6666" =============================================== I'm really clueless here... :-/ so thanks in advance for any help. PS. I hope formating will be ok now... O:-) And sorry for the long email. -fs ------------------------------ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 1, Issue 1445 ********************************************
