On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Joe Klemmer wrote: > On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 16:33, Res wrote: > > > > FC1 is as stable for servers as RH9 ever was. The only disadvantage to > > > Fedora on REAL servers is it's update cycle. It will cost a lot more in > > > > what rubbish, see my original post. > > I did. You are not correct on this but it seems that you are firmly > entrenched in your beliefs that no amount of logic or proof would change > your mind. Really... proof ? I see all the proof I need every day right here. I wouldnt put fedora on a mail server doing 10 msgs a second leta lone 100 which RH9 handles without effort, as does the slackware boxes :)
