On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 16:33, Res wrote: > > FC1 is as stable for servers as RH9 ever was. The only disadvantage to > > Fedora on REAL servers is it's update cycle. It will cost a lot more in > > what rubbish, see my original post. I did. You are not correct on this but it seems that you are firmly entrenched in your beliefs that no amount of logic or proof would change your mind. > > be. And you must be forgetting about the 2.x, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x, 6.x days > > as well. Fedora is not bullet proof. Neither was RH9. If you want > > RH9 is bullet proof on the 3 RH9 boxes remaining. Since you have moved into the realm of irrationality there's no point in continuing this. -- Kuramarujo - http://www.webtrek.com/~klemmerj/sumo.html
