I think if fedora would be a viable data center OS, the community needs to start a project similar to the gentoo Server Project. http://www.subverted.net/wakka/wakka.php?wakka=MainPage I am personally very interested in contributing to such project. nadeem On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 07:33 +1000, Res wrote: > On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Joe Klemmer wrote: > > > > > Slackware. There's just to much missing from it. I know it can do the > > > > job just fine but the maintenance of a Slack box is astronomical > > > > compared to any of the other distros. You would probably be better > > > > > > actually no, its about the same as RH. > > > > On what planet? > > On Earth lamer, we've run em both side by side, no more maint has had to > be given to the slackware boxes than any RH box. > > > > FC1 is as stable for servers as RH9 ever was. The only disadvantage to > > Fedora on REAL servers is it's update cycle. It will cost a lot more in > > what rubbish, see my original post. > > > > > > I'm guessing that you did an upgrade from the 7.3 boxes to FC1. That's > > No! clean installs on both. > > > FC1 is much more reliable and stable than RH8 ever dreamed it could > who said anything about 8? never used 8 at all. > > > be. And you must be forgetting about the 2.x, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x, 6.x days > > as well. Fedora is not bullet proof. Neither was RH9. If you want > > RH9 is bullet proof on the 3 RH9 boxes remaining. > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list --
