On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 01:05, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Jim Popovitch (jimpop@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > > > But can't you have an existing initrd without mkinitrd? > > > > So, you think that you need mkinitrd to boot a initrd' kernel? > > To make a new initrd when you upgrade your kernel, yes. AHHH, but in order to be that far down the road, you would already have booted your lvm root partition, thus negating the need to require lvm as a dependency of mkinitrd. So, since you seem to be defending the practice, why again is lvm a dependency of mkinitrd? Chicken != Egg. ;) -Jim P.