Jim Popovitch (jimpop@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > It's not 'to not inconvenience them', it's 'to keep their systems > > functional'. There's a slight difference. > > But I don't understand how you could have an LVM system without the lvm > rpm (tools,etc?), but I see how most people would have mkinitrd and not > need it's lvm dependency. If I understand this correctly, you DONT need > mkinitrd to have an lvm system, You absolutely need mkinitrd to have a LVM system. In fact, it's one of the ones you *can't* boot without an initrd. Feel free to file a bug against mkinitrd. In the grand scheme of things, it's $.20 of disk space. ;) Bill
