On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 05:14:59PM -0500, Mark Mielke wrote: > If, on the other hand, Fedora Core expands (as it seems the plans > include) to allow the code author's to submit their own SRPM/RPM > packages, then it may be feasible, and sensible to allow products > such as Tiny DNS to be included in Fedora Core. You wouldn't have to > feel like you were doing something wrong, the author of Tiny DNS > wouldn't feel like control of development was being taken away from > him, and it is possible that *everybody* would be happy. No! *I* and many others won't be happy. Fedora Core should *only* include real free / Open Source software and nothing more. The whole "situation" doesn't change at all when the author himself would provide the rpm's, if the conditions stay the same. You have the right to have your own opinion, of course, but be aware that a lot of people are firm supporters of free / Open Source software (and some of them - like myself - have written such software themselves) and will stay to refuse using DJB software - even for personal use - given the current conditions. -- -- Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> -- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364 -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204
