Re: Bind v. TinyDNS

To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Bind v. TinyDNS
From: Christopher Chan <cchan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 20:17:16 +0800
In-reply-to: <1073054531.3438.48.camel@roque>
References: <[email protected]> <1073054531.3438.48.camel@roque>
Reply-to: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4

Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:

On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 14:31, David C. Hart wrote:

I have TinyDNS patched and running (if I want). Does anyone have any
strong feelings one way or the other vs Bind on Fedora C1?

Yes, I do. As most if not all Dan J. Bernstein's software,

  TinyDNS is NEITHER Free Software nor Open Source Software.

Regards, Rui


http://cr.yp.to/softwarelaw.html

djbdns is free and the source code is open.

Just because it does not come with a license does not make any less so.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bind v. TinyDNS
  - From: Rui Miguel Seabra
- Re: Bind v. TinyDNS
  - From: Jeff Kinz

References:
- Bind v. TinyDNS
  - From: David C. Hart
- Re: Bind v. TinyDNS
  - From: Rui Miguel Seabra