Bind v. TinyDNS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Fedora-List <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Bind v. TinyDNS
From: "David C. Hart" <dch@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 09:31:17 -0500
Reply-to: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx

I have TinyDNS patched and running (if I want). Does anyone have any
strong feelings one way or the other vs Bind on Fedora C1?

                               ---------
            Quality Management - A Commitment to Excellence

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bind v. TinyDNS
  - From: Christopher Chan
- Re: Bind v. TinyDNS
  - From: Rui Miguel Seabra

Prev by Date: Re: Images admin
Next by Date: Missing linked files in etc/sysconfig/networking
Previous by thread: fedora.us downtime preparation details
Next by thread: Re: Bind v. TinyDNS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux