Re: Bind v. TinyDNS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 21:35, Ron Bickers wrote:
> On 01/04/2004 8:42 AM, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
> 
> > Every time there an update on one patch, those admins suffer real pains
> > that could have been avoided if but Dan's arrogance allowed it.
> 
> Arrogance?  DJB has written a lot of great software and has allowed us to
> use it and the source code free of charge.  That's hardly arrogance.  You
> can disagree with the license he has chosen for the software that he wrote,
> but to shun him for not doing it your way is unfair.

You've never seen him write, right? :)
Besides, I believe that placing artificial restrictions upon others is
of an enormous arrogance.

> I also wish the FUD would stop about his distribution limitations (not from
> you, Rui, just in general).

Only if you mean Fact, Undeniable, Demonstrable.

>   His Web site is clear about what is allowed and what isn't.

Of course. You can't publish an improved qmail, even to your friends who
don't know how to patch.

> There is no reason FC could not include DJB software but for
> FC's own policy limitations.  I'm not suggesting FC change its limitations
> and include any DJB software; frankly, I don't care either way.  It's not
> hard to maintain a single RPM with whatever patches I want and install it on
> many servers.

Fortunately, Fedora Core's goals do not allow for unfair conditions
placed upon it's users.

By my own self imposed limitation, I will not support or use software
which carries a bad social effect to those who are near me.

> PS.  Someday, perhaps, the FC list admins will answer my e-mails and I can
> actually post to the list.  Arg...

Have you tried mailing fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx with help on the
body?

Good luck,

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux