On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 13:01, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > That's a good point. The name is quite unfortunate in this sense, > given the traditional meaning given to the alternatives system. Oh, > well... I guess it's not too late to change this. Any better > suggestions to convey the notion that `this repository contains > packages that will overlap with, update or even obsolete packages in > the Core'? > Graft? Overlay? Branch? Fork? Mask? Split?
