On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 04:11:46AM -0800, bishop wrote: > >>Wouldn't it be great if all these projects will start to co-ordinate > >>with each other somehow? To not re-invent the whell and all that... > >[root@ithaca bin]# rpm -q apt > >apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1 > >[root@ithaca bin]# rpm -i > >http://atrpms.physik.fu-berlin.de/dist/rh9/atrpms/atrpms-25-1.rh9.at.noarch.rpm > >warning: /var/tmp/rpm-xfer.UGY9M7: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 66534c2b > > file /etc/apt/rpmpriorities from install of atrpms-25-1.rh9.at > > conflicts with file from package apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1 > > file /etc/apt/sources.list from install of atrpms-25-1.rh9.at > > conflicts with file from package apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1 > > file /etc/apt/vendors.list from install of atrpms-25-1.rh9.at > > conflicts with file from package apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1 > > I've probably mailed you on this bug already. That's not a bug. If you have mailed me, I will have certainly pointed you to ATrpms' installation instructions or the man page of apt/yum to check about apt-get dist-upgrade/yum upgrade. > I've caused rippling, repeating failures in whole NSC clusters. Your > coordination is no match for the awesome bug-finding power of my karma! > Moohahahahahaha! (aka "my karma ran over your coordination") 8-) On the other side of the equation there are several thousands of _concurrent_ users of atrpms/freshrpms/newrpms/dag/jpackage/planetccrma/vlugnet/kde-redhat etc that manage to get along fine. So I guess they have a different karma ;) Oh, yes, coordination could be far better than it is now, no doubt! -- Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpYuywmsczXT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
