Re: Freshrpms.net concerns.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Axel Thimm wrote:

On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 08:22:05PM -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:

On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 12:41, Marc Williams wrote:

I *think* that ATrpms, Freshrpms, Dag, and a few others collude so as to
make these sorts of conflicts unlikely.

Wouldn't it be great if all these projects will start to co-ordinate with each other somehow? To not re-invent the whell and all that...

Yes, and they already do.

Yes, but ..

[root@ithaca bin]# rpm -q apt
apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
[root@ithaca bin]# rpm -i http://atrpms.physik.fu-berlin.de/dist/rh9/atrpms/atrpms-25-1.rh9.at.noarch.rpm
warning: /var/tmp/rpm-xfer.UGY9M7: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 66534c2b
        file /etc/apt/rpmpriorities from install of atrpms-25-1.rh9.at conflicts with file from package apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
        file /etc/apt/sources.list from install of atrpms-25-1.rh9.at conflicts with file from package apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
        file /etc/apt/vendors.list from install of atrpms-25-1.rh9.at conflicts with file from package apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1

I've probably mailed you on this bug already.

I've caused rippling, repeating failures in whole NSC clusters. Your coordination is no match for the awesome bug-finding power of my karma! Moohahahahahaha! (aka "my karma ran over your coordination") 8-)

 - bish




[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux