Adrian Bunk wrote:
That's an interesting viewpoint, only programmers have useful thoughts... ignoring users, people who have CS degrees but don't code, etc. I would think there's value in any rational suggestions which include technical justification for the suggestion.On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 12:42:02AM -0700, Natalie Protasevich wrote:... Then I think bugzilla needs: adding more categories such as security,"security" would be a flag like "regression", not a category.system calls (lots of implementation suggestions for posix and non-posix ones), ...Bugzilla is for tracking bugs, not for discussing possible kernel features.Tracking feature or implementation suggestions wouldn't make sense. Consider e.g. that there are several people on linux-kernel who often write what they think the kernel should do but who never write a single line of code themselves. There's no value in tracking such stuff.
-- Bill Davidsen <[email protected]> "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21
- From: Michal Piotrowski <[email protected]>
- Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)
- From: Michal Piotrowski <[email protected]>
- Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)
- From: "Michal Piotrowski" <[email protected]>
- Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)
- From: "Michal Piotrowski" <[email protected]>
- Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)
- From: "David Rees" <[email protected]>
- Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)
- From: "Natalie Protasevich" <[email protected]>
- Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] ser_a2232.c bug removed: handles "IRQ request denied" case
- Next by Date: Re: [FIX] mntput called before dput in afs
- Previous by thread: Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases?
- Next by thread: Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)
- Index(es):
 |