Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 27/08/07, Daniel Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 13:38 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > On 27/08/07, Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I'm not sure that we need one, really.  Any bugs in a stable release can be
> > > handled via email and/or bugzilla as we are presently doing?
> > >
> > > What I'm concerned about is that regressions which we didn't fix are just
> > > getting lost.  Is anyone taking care to ensure that they are getting
> > > transitioned into bugzilla for tracking?
> >
> > I can copy all regression reports into Bugzilla after each release.
> Should we get the regression field fix before? Or had you planned on
> just bypassing that completely ?

IMO solution proposed by David seems
to be most reasonable.

> Daniel


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux