On 27/08/07, Daniel Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 13:38 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > On 27/08/07, Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
[..]
> > > I'm not sure that we need one, really. Any bugs in a stable release can be
> > > handled via email and/or bugzilla as we are presently doing?
> > >
> > > What I'm concerned about is that regressions which we didn't fix are just
> > > getting lost. Is anyone taking care to ensure that they are getting
> > > transitioned into bugzilla for tracking?
> >
> > I can copy all regression reports into Bugzilla after each release.
>
> Should we get the regression field fix before? Or had you planned on
> just bypassing that completely ?
IMO solution proposed by David http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/27/21 seems
to be most reasonable.
>
> Daniel
>
>
Regards,
Michal
--
LOG
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
