Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)

Daniel Walker pisze:
[snip]
> Have you considered maintaining all the lists in Bugzilla?

Yes, I have considered it.

Bugzilla sucks when it comes to tracking things. There is
a regression field, but there are no difference between
2.6.22 and 2.6.23 regression.

Most people are reporting bugs through LKML:
- 23 regressions with reference to LKML
- 4 regressions with reference to Bugzilla

> If you had a
> search of open bugs they would just fall of the list as they get
> closed.. 

Unfortunately, the world is not perfect.

Is anyone interested in maintaining KR list for stable releases?

> 
> Daniel
> 
> 

Regards,
Michal

-- 
LOG
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)
    • From: "David Rees" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• References:
  • nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21
    • From: Björn Steinbrink <[email protected]>
  • Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21
    • From: Michal Piotrowski <[email protected]>
  • Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Problems with disc-performance and libata
• Next by Date: [PATCH] Document the fact that smsc-ircc2 will not use PNP by default
• Previous by thread: Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21
• Next by thread: Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]