Re: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ingo Molnar wrote:
well, i just simulated a runaway X at nice -19 on CFS (on a UP box), and
while the box was a tad laggy, i was able to killall it without
problems, within 2 seconds that also included a 'su'. So it's not an
issue in CFS, it can be turned off, and because every distro has another
way to renice Xorg, this is a convenience hack until Xorg standardizes
it into some xorg.conf field. (It also makes sure that X isnt preempted
by other userspace stuff while it does timing-sensitive operations like
setting the video modes up or switching video modes, etc.)
Good!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux