Re: Wrong free clusters count on FAT32

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bodo Eggert <[email protected]> writes:

> Windows _does_ care*, it will pretend the disk to be full.

Did you test on 2000 or XP? (e.g. write 0 to free_clusters, then
create new file.)

> - usefree is a bad name (I'd suggest recalc_free instead),

Is it about nofree option?

> and your description is too cryptic to be understood by a non-linux
> FAT expert.

Um... why do we need to care about non-linux people in the patch?
Anyway, if you correct it, I'll update it gladly.

> - You forgot to update Documentation/

Sure. If you can post the patch, it'll be great.

Thanks.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux