Re: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]> wrote:

> > i've attached it below in a standalone form, feel free to put it 
> > into SD! :)
> 
> Assume X went crazy (lacking any statistics, I make the unproven 
> statement that this happens more often than kthreads going berserk), 
> then having it niced with minus something is not too nice.

i've not experienced a 'runaway X' personally, at most it would crash or 
lock up ;) The value is boot-time and sysctl configurable as well back 
to 0.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux