Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree

On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 16:35 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> I think you know what your talking about, and I respect your opinion.. I
> think you have some points, that I will follow up on. However most of
> what your saying comes off to me like, "Reverse _all_ your changes!" ,
> "Makes this patch set go away for 2 months", and I don't understand
> where that is coming from.

I did nowhere say, that you should revert _ALL_ your changes ! If you
need 2 month to fixup the issues I pointed at , I can't help it.

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] libata: skip reset on bus not a device
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] [kernel/ subdirectory] constifications
• Previous by thread: Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
• Next by thread: [PATCH] um: setup irq regs in do_IRQ
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]