Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree

On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 23:38 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> 
> I don't see that behaviour on my machines and nobody complains about
> that. I don't care about stale comments. Point me to a bug report
> instead of your perception of what's optimal and not.

Let both do this. Lets discuss empirical behavior. Otherwise we aren't
making any progress. 

> Working is not necessary optimal, but your vision of optimal is not
> necessarily working either.

I'm looking for the TSC issue you mentioned.. I tested it as best I
could, so I need more information to say it's not working.

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: + clocksource-add-generic-sched_clock.patch added to -mm tree
• Next by Date: drivers/char/specialix.c: broken baud conversion
• Previous by thread: Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
• Next by thread: Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]