Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree

On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 10:06 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 18:53 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> > Since it's likely that this interface would get used during bootup I moved all
> > the clocksource registration into the postcore initcall.  This also eliminated
> > some clocksource shuffling during bootup.
> 
> We had the init call in postcore already. John moved it to module init
> to eliminate trouble with unsynced / unstable TSCs, IIRC.
> 
> John, can you please comment on this.

It also breaks pmtimer.

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: OT: linux-kernel list and greylisting
• Next by Date: Re: monitor not active after boot (was Re: Merge window closed: v2.6.19-rc1)
• Previous by thread: Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
• Next by thread: Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]