I answered a mail about how klive data should not be took in account, and could even be dangerous... On Thu, July 27, 2006 13:35, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 01:07:27PM +0200, Luigi Genoni wrote: > > >> Still I am missing something. >> >> >> I am not interested in discussing about 1:5 ora 5:1 or so on. >> I am not even interested if reiser4 users are 35 or 35000. >> But if some people felt they need reiser4 to get their work done, that >> means something. The numbers and the datum per se are meaningless. ... >> > > You answered to an email where I talked about the wrong assumption the > klive data could support the 1:5 market share claim. > > This is completely independent from discussions about why users might > need reiser4, or which technical or social problems prevent its merging > (unless of course someone wants to justify its merging wrongly with the > 1:5 claim), and therefore your answer does not apply to this part of > the thread. > > cu Adrian > > > -- > > > "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out > of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," > Lao Er said. > Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed > > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: [email protected]
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: "J. Bruce Fields" <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: [email protected]
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: [email protected]
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: the ' 'official' point of view' expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: "Luigi Genoni" <[email protected]>
- Re: the ' 'official' point of view' expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: the ' 'official' point of view' expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: "Luigi Genoni" <[email protected]>
- Re: the ' 'official' point of view' expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Prev by Date: [patch -mm] s390: remove s390 touch_nmi_watchdog() define
- Next by Date: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Previous by thread: Re: the ' 'official' point of view' expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Next by thread: Re: the ' 'official' point of view' expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Index(es):