On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 10:50:22PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > But depending on the nature of the error, the worst case might be the > common case (as I've already explained in another email). > > If you can't ensure the quality of your data, please don't use this data > to wrongly draw any conclusions from them [1]. Please read the footer of the KLive pages: "The use of the information and of the software in this website is at your own risk. KLive probably doesn't represent a reliable sample of the real usage of the Linux Kernel." Said that pretending that KLive data has absolutely no significance at all and that you can't draw any conclusion at all from it, to me seems as wrong as pretending it to perfect. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: [email protected]
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: [email protected]
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: [email protected]
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: "J. Bruce Fields" <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: [email protected]
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Prev by Date: Re: Unreachable e-mailaddresses in maintainers file
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] Reorganize the cpufreq cpu hotplug locking to not be totally bizare
- Previous by thread: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Next by thread: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Index(es):