On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 01:07:27PM +0200, Luigi Genoni wrote: > Still I am missing something. > > I am not interested in discussing about 1:5 ora 5:1 or so on. > I am not even interested if reiser4 users are 35 or 35000. > But if some people felt they need reiser4 to get their work done, that means > something. The numbers and the datum per se are meaningless. >... You answered to an email where I talked about the wrong assumption the klive data could support the 1:5 market share claim. This is completely independent from discussions about why users might need reiser4, or which technical or social problems prevent its merging (unless of course someone wants to justify its merging wrongly with the 1:5 claim), and therefore your answer does not apply to this part of the thread. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: [email protected]
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: "J. Bruce Fields" <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: [email protected]
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: [email protected]
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: the ' 'official' point of view' expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: "Luigi Genoni" <[email protected]>
- Re: the ' 'official' point of view' expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: the ' 'official' point of view' expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: "Luigi Genoni" <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] i386: initialize end-of-memory variables as early as possible
- Next by Date: XFS / Quota Bug in 2.6.17.x and 2.6.18x
- Previous by thread: Re: the ' 'official' point of view' expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Next by thread: Re: the ' 'official' point of view' expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Index(es):